Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2000
Abstract
The Article argues for the recognition of same-sex marriage from a normative and family law perspective, rather than a rights perspective. Contemporary family law and marriage law in the United States have been criticized by communitarian scholars and others as being too focused on individuals and individual fulfillment. These critiques make some valid points. It is also important, however, to emphasize that contemporary marriage law, for the first time, presents a model of equality and of reciprocal obligations.
The Article articulates a broad framework of the functions of family and marriage law, drawing on work by Carl Schneider and Mary Ann Glendon. It applies both this framework and the communitarian critique of family law to the issue of same-sex marriage, also referred to in the Article as ‘same-gender marriage'. This analysis leads to the conclusion that same-sex marriage should be recognized. All the key functions of family law - the expressive, protective, facilitative, dispute resolution, and channeling functions - call for recognition of same-sex marriage. Strong morality-based arguments actually support same-sex marriage. Arguments against same-sex marriage, discussed in the Article, contribute to the 'atomistic' focus of contemporary family law.
Publication Title
Boston College Law Review
Volume
41
Article Number
1047
First Page
265
Suggested Bluebook Citation
Jennifer Wriggins,
Marriage Law and Family Law: Autonomy, Interdependence, and Couples of the Same Gender,
41
B.C. L. Rev.
265
(2000).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/faculty-publications/46