Abstract
The increasing interest in arbitration as a means of judicial reform has been largely due to the fact that arbitration provides a forum for dispute settlement apart from the traditional judicial system. In other words, arbitration is regarded as a useful reform measure primarily because it affords potential litigants a forum other than the already over-burdened courts. Little consideration has been given to the possibility that in some areas arbitration may in fact be both a better forum and a better method of resolving disputes than the traditional judicial system. This article will discuss three areas, areas which are susceptible to the use of arbitration and in which it may prove superior to the present court system.
First Page
215
Recommended Citation
Mashall E. Lippman,
Arbitration as an Alternative to Judicial Settlement: Some Selected Perspectives,
24
Me. L. Rev.
215
(1972).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/mlr/vol24/iss2/3