Abstract
The concern of both the federal and state courts in the litigation between Schiavone and Corenco was to provide adequate protection to the existing shareholders of the target company during the battle for corporate control. Viewed together, these cases illustrate the limits of federal protection and the possibility of further protection through state law. This Note analyzes the rationales of both decisions and considers whether further regulation is warranted.
First Page
93
Recommended Citation
Maine Law Review,
Corenco v. Schiavone: The Cash Tender Offeror as Corporate Raider,
26
Me. L. Rev.
93
(1974).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/mlr/vol26/iss1/4