Abstract
The various rules a court may invoke as the time-worn tests of a statute's meaning reveal little of its institutional approach to statutory construction unless considered in the light of particular cases to which they are applied. Mindful that courts generally have failed to develop consistent approaches to statutory construction, the following survey attempts to rough out the contours of Maine doctrine. The reader should note that any critical evaluations derive from stated preferences for particular approaches to problems of statutory construction, and should recall that opinion on these topics varies widely.
First Page
72
Recommended Citation
Maine Law Review,
Statutory Construction,
30
Me. L. Rev.
72
(1978).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/mlr/vol30/iss1/9